By Nick Mangwana
The drama in our party continues
unabated and it’s catching the imagination of the international media. Only
last week I had 1 radio interview and 2 radio discussions. At the centre of all
this was the notion that Zanu PF was imploding. As the party representative on
this continent, I kept the party
narrative given to outsiders; there are
no factions in Zanu PF. But dear Cde Reader, you and I know better. However we will continue to completely deny
the existence of factions even if it makes us look silly and sound ridiculous.
The defence is always to say that Zanu PF like
every organisation has no homogeneity of ideas.
You cannot have an organisation which is over 50 years old, and has a
membership of millions of people and you have all these people thinking the
same, holding the same value system and having the same vision. That would be
clearly a lie. Now those keen to tell or hear lies can go to another column to
look for such. Here we are frank. We tell it as it is.
If twins who have pretty much the
same genetic structure, are raised eating the same food and even wearing the
same type of clothes can fight, how about millions of people with different
genetical compositions and raised under different domestic value system who
went to different schools and have different life experiences, how much more
should there be a plurality of thought and diversity of ideas? I think if
people tell you that they agree with everything a leader does they are a bunch
of either liars or numpties. Damn, I
never agreed with everything my father did and yet he taught me most of the
things I know today. I view the world through the prism of his value system yet
there are things we could never see eye to eye on. So if I cannot agree 100% with my father how
much more should be expected that people in the same party would view things
differently?
What keeps families and
organisations together regardless of this plurality of visions or ideas is
respect and discipline. That’s what brings order. I am no hired gun for any of the so-called
factions. The leader is President Mugabe. After him is a brilliant team that
has contesting views and my take on those views is eclectic. This means there
are things from either side which find resonance with my own views. I am also on good terms with my leaders and
those around them regardless of their own differences. I am proud of some of the things a lot of them
do and so if it was my choice I would keep them that way.
For starters I identify with the
current commissariat. Some of my reasons are quite selfish. For example, the
reason that for the first time in the history of the party bar 1980, this
commissariat has put two Diasporans in parliament. It is selfish view because I consider the
Diaspora my constituency. This is a progressive approach and one I will ever be
so grateful. And I think this would have
probably struggled to find traction with the old team. It is dynamism of this
nature that can only take the country forward. So am I a member of an imaginary
faction? No way.
The President in the abundance of
his wisdom chose people whom he knew would be safe to assist him run the
country. He felt comfortable with those he chose himself this time round after
he had been subjected to treachery. These are people he saw fit to act in his
position when he is not around. If the
President can trust his deputies that much and I trust my President, then because I trust his judgement, I give my
full backing to my vice presidents. But do I then belong to a faction now?
Hell, no. I belong to Zanu PF. Like the President said, even he also simply
belongs to Zanu PF.
What our party needs is to be
able to pull together despite these varying views. Just like a country. In
regular democracy, if one is voted in by 51% of those that vote he becomes a
leader including of those 49% who voted against him and those that did not
bother to go vote. The leader represents
them all. They are obliged to pull together with that leader despite their divergent views. Now a party cannot pull
together if it is divided into contesting factions. Warring factions cannot walk in unison. There
should be a difference between having different sides to a debate in a
political party to having factions. Factions
create contra powers. People spend too
much time trying to counteract and create a Zero sum situation on each
other’s moves instead of supporting the President to fulfil his mandate. When this happens, the people suffer and the
party suffers.
No comments:
Post a Comment