By Nick Mangwana
Most of the people that follow sport know
the one simple truth; the same crowd that cheers you, is the same crowd that
would boo you. This is how fickle the temperament of the people is like. Talking
of sport reminds me that football is almost like a religion. You cannot support
Arsenal today and Manchester United tomorrow. No matter how bad your Arsenal
plays, you will boo them, drink your sorrows and wake up tomorrow supporting
them. It is matter of the heart, an emotional attachment. Not an intellectual
affinity.
But the fickleness of politics is a bit
different. This is one area where an
individual can disavow of their team or even tactically vote for a rival team
to make a point. Whilst I believe this
to be true I contend there are exceptions to this rule. I don’t think a genuine
member of Zanu PF can ever vote for Morgan Tsvangirayi. That is just unreal. So please hold on to that thought as embark
on some Frank Talk.
As is my custom I came to Zimbabwe for the
Independence Celebrations in April. The
event was breath taking. Everything was on point. The entertainment, the choreography
and dramatisation of the Liberation Struggle and the nations’ history were just
exquisite. But the highlight for me was the sheer number of people that came to
attend the celebrations. It was clear that Harare had come out. There stadium
was bursting but yet there more outside than those inside. As if to prove a
point the moment the celebrations finished hordes of people left, proving that
they had not come for football but for the momentous day. What was also clear was that the people that
came out were more aligned to Zanu PF than to the opposition parties. This is not to say that the Independence
Celebrations are a zanu PF event. That would be wrong. This is just to say
since the opposition leadership did not come to the celebrations, their
supporters followed their lead. Imagine some Zanu PF comrades came all the way
from London. And yet the counter-revolutionaries did not bother even though
they were in Harare. Hold on to that thought again. One day we shall
revisit.
About a month pulling these massive
numbers, Zanu PF showed again its mobilisation capacity when a huge assemblage
converged in Harare for what was dubbed the Million Man March. Another show of
pulling power of the Ruling party among the poor. A mobilisation tour de force.
But on the 6th of July Zimbabwe’s
towns were brought to a standstill by what primarily are cyber activists. There is one thing that has to be clear
here. It will be perceived as the height
of arrogance to dismiss this as the work of malcontents and mischief
makers. A lot of people who participated
in the stay away were Zanu PF members. Why?
Well, it is the same people that attended the
Independence Celebrations (our people) that today stayed away from their usual
day to day actives. The very same ones who filled buses coming from province
afar to show solidarity with their President who on the 6th heeded
the call of faceless activists. For if
they had chosen to ignore that Harare and all other urban centres would have
steamed up with people at works. It
would be unmitigated immodesty to claim that since we don’t win a lot in urban
areas these were not our people anyway.
No mashefu, these were our people. This is why when these calls for
boycotts or stay always are called by the opposition parties they are not
anywhere near this successful. Our Zanu PF members and supporters cannot play
for a Team Tsvangirayi. Never. They would rather kick it into the long grass
than score for that man. This is because our people cannot stomach being part
to a Tsvangirayi or more recently Mujuru agenda. They have no problem with a
citizen agenda. Let us stop and listen
to what they are saying. There is a subtext beyond what was declared. They are
saying they love Zanu PF but Zanu PF has to love them back by taking their
voice seriously. At the top of what’s aggrieving the rank and file is our
tolerance of naked corruption in our midst. Our people have spoken, we should listen.
This group calling itself “Tajamuka” or
whatever ridiculous name is not making any demands which are very different
from those presented by Cde Chipanga on the 25th of May 2016. The
only difference is the talk of the self-serving Import licenses. But the exasperation expressed by Cde
Chipanga over corrupt top officials is the same. The point I am making is that
there has been little action after Cde Chipanga’s speech and therefore that
message has been hijacked and repackaged and relabelled from Zanu PF Youth
League to Tajamuka. This has to be taken
seriously. Let us act on corruption.
Our leadership should not show an arrogance
of power by ignoring this. It is a sign
of destructive self-righteousness to be contemptuous of the people that vote us
into power. Vendors or touts do not all belong to the opposition. A lot belong to us. In any case it doesn’t
really matter because the whole point is that these people are Zimbabweans
whose voice should be heeded. It is
repulsive to abuse our young people by using them as cannon fodder during
sundry campaigns and ignore them, only to recycle them again after.
We cannot afford to miss the mood of the
people, comrades. Truth be told, they are not happy. I am not asking the leadership to heed
populist demands like repealing SI 64/ 2016. That is a very sensible piece of
law. I am not asking the leadership to bin the idea of bond notes. Bond notes
are a brilliant idea, whatever people’s institutional memory tells them. I am
asking for corrupt people to be dealt with. Only then when the government cannot
afford to pay wages, will the people empathise because they won’t point to a
glaring misuse of the money as well as the pilferage though the tender system.
The idea of dismissing urban dwellers as
opposition supporters and rural folks as our own supporters (true as it might
be) might be interpreted by our own supporters as hubris. We cannot afford as a party to have the
populace lose faith in us. When they express disillusionment let us acknowledge
it. If we did in, we dig in but we take corrective action. Comrades, we have to acknowledge when it us
and not others who have a problem. The externalisation of problems is for the
consumption of others. We have to be honest with ourselves and carry the people
with us. We banish the people, the people will banish us.
Haile Selasie one of the founding fathers of Pan- Africanism
said, “Throughout
history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the
indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice of
justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph.”
I have chosen to speak frankly. May my party choose to act boldly on corruption.
First Published in the People's Voice 8-14 November 2016
I like your post a lot I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I've enjoyed browsing your posts. I will subscribe to your feed, and I look forward to reading your next post. I highly recommended
ReplyDelete